User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 05:16, 16 November 2009 diff hist +10 Talk:Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
- 05:10, 16 November 2009 diff hist +1,961 Talk:Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
- 00:43, 13 November 2009 diff hist -1 m William Dembski →Dembski and intelligent design: Chaged "can not" to "cannot".
- 23:29, 12 November 2009 diff hist +1,355 N Talk:Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence Created page with 'I consider myself a confirmed skeptic, but I'm not sure about the "extraordinary claims require . . ." rule. The Alice and Bob analogy is clever, but what happens when we try to ...'