User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 14:29, 2 March 2018 diff hist +277 m A priori and a posteriori As useless as a priori can be at times, it would seem improper to not note its implementation in mathematics.
- 23:41, 21 December 2017 diff hist +1,164 Talk:Infinite regress →Chicken and egg
- 15:41, 21 December 2017 diff hist -2 m Talk:Infinite regress →Chicken and egg
- 15:40, 21 December 2017 diff hist +1 m Talk:Infinite regress →Chicken and egg
- 15:40, 21 December 2017 diff hist +1,710 Talk:Infinite regress →Chicken and egg
- 12:50, 21 December 2017 diff hist 0 User:RyanHutchinson current
- 12:47, 21 December 2017 diff hist +1,245 Talk:Infinite regress →Examples of Infinite Regression: new section
- 12:35, 21 December 2017 diff hist -5 m Infinite regress Changed the opening sentence. Specifically, the 'homunculus fallacy' was asserted to be a synonym for 'infinite regress', when it is only an example of it.
- 14:15, 5 April 2017 diff hist -7 m Daily Mail You can't use the word 'lately' to describe the chronology of an event, if you don't give a source. Was it lately now, or am I now late?
- 08:57, 5 April 2017 diff hist +993 N User:RyanHutchinson Created page with " Hello, and welcome to my home page. If you're reading this, then you're probably here to complain. That's alright! Feel free to message me if you're wound up, or just go ah..."
- 11:00, 4 April 2017 diff hist +661 Hinduism Your page on Hinduism is rather short and flattering, so I added a short addition to the Hindu view of Samsara and Naraka. Since you didn't capitalise on the section, neither shall I.
- 09:08, 4 April 2017 diff hist +28 m FAQ for the Newly Deconverted Oh, you mentioned evidence twice in the definition of rationalism. Just to clarify, rationalists often accept evidence, but they also allow an argument that can be held by logical reasoning. For example, syllogisms, or tautologies.
- 08:08, 4 April 2017 diff hist -2 m FAQ for the Newly Deconverted When you define rationalism, you refer to the gathering of evidence-however, this would seem to be a more empirical viewpoint. Rationalists always need logical thought, but not always physical evidence.
- 11:26, 3 April 2017 diff hist +372 m Problem of evil I have added the inconsistent triad to the LPOE, which is a famous example of the argument. I have also added Plantinga's free will defence at the end of it. They are both currently unsourced, so feel free to add any necessary sources.