User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 15:06, 28 May 2014 diff hist -23 m PETA →Footnotes: Anyway, this page is a complete distortion of the organization's actual record and stances, and you obviously don't care. Sad!
- 15:04, 28 May 2014 diff hist -33 PETA Just curious: Are you "proud" of being a dupe of corporate interests? Are you an avowed enemy of animals and animal rights? That's, um, "rational"?
- 14:58, 28 May 2014 diff hist -33 PETA No shame? Typical. Your message proves absolutely nothing. In this case, you are shilling for corporations that profit on animal abuse, whether you acknowledge it or not. Pathetic.
- 13:58, 28 May 2014 diff hist -76 PETA Well, I certainly know now why wiki is considered a bad joke! This page is a farce, a corporate hatchet job masquerading as a "rational" assessment. You should be embarrassed.
- 13:37, 28 May 2014 diff hist -16,237 PETA This page is biased corporate propaganda and should be removed. It is not "rational" or fair in the slightest. Whoever is editing it either has an agenda or is clueless.
- 03:32, 28 May 2014 diff hist -69 Ingrid Newkirk
- 03:31, 28 May 2014 diff hist -14 Ingrid Newkirk →Footnotes
- 03:31, 28 May 2014 diff hist -426 Ingrid Newkirk
- 03:30, 28 May 2014 diff hist -212 Ingrid Newkirk
- 03:28, 28 May 2014 diff hist -9 PETA
- 03:27, 28 May 2014 diff hist -33 PETA →Footnotes
- 03:26, 28 May 2014 diff hist -15,066 PETA The content of this page was absurdly biased in a kind of ultra-Fox News "fair and balanced" manner and clearly heavily influenced and perhaps even written by the CCF. This content of this page needs a complete overhaul.