2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

Talk:Conservapedia's double standard

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The article is legitimate criticism, but I don't think it's enough to warrant a separate article. Any objections to my deleting this and merging the content in to the existing CP articles (with some citations and removal of the personal comments)? --ConcernedResident omg ponies!!! 06:54, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Lets see, wrong namespace, nothing we haven't heard before, nothing we don't already have 200+ articles on. I am deleting. - π 07:14, 1 June 2010 (UTC)