Talk:Infancy Gospel of James

title

Since this is part of the "guide" series, it should be named in a similar fashion, I think. ħuman 23:06, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Yeah. Wasn't sure what to do about that. It has 3 formal "titles", the most descriptive is "Infancy Gospel" (which is the one I learned in school, some 15 years back), teh Gospel of James, and the Protoevangellian (meaning, before the comming, before birth). I chose Infancy, cause it's the one that tells me what is in it. But I'm good with what ever anyone decides!--WaitingforGodot 23:10, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Perhaps we should eventually move it to "Guide to Gospel of James"? Easy enough to do, and we can leave the redirects since they might be useful. ħuman 23:18, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Sure. I still need to learn "redirecting", though i've mastered the art of "relocating". I hadn't read your comments on the use of "guide" with a header, when I wrote this, so it didn't have that text yet. --WaitingforGodot 23:25, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Well, when you use the "relocate" button (and move the talk page too, k?), "redirects" are automatically created from the old titles to the new ones. ħuman 23:33, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Ouch, not sure if "infancy" really belongs in the title? Can you throw me some random source to convince me? ħuman 04:25, 17 July 2008 (EDT)

Anon delivers. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 05:13, 17 July 2008 (EDT)

Fine with me, thanks! ħuman 05:24, 17 July 2008 (EDT)