The extremely detailed documentation disproving the levitation footage here is invaluable, editors; Please find and provide suitable documentation also disproving Hutchinson's alleged 'metal transmutation' studies, as he has also created countless 'documentation' of metals and materials deconstructed and transformed, obviously simple tricks. I know it would be easy gather from a steelworker or metal craftsman/tradesman how these objects and "transformations" were created, and would be invaluable to sustaining he is indeed a charlatan, as the majority of the documented experiments were the "transmutations" I mention here. not the levitation videos. — Unsigned, by: 22.214.171.124 / talk / contribs
A bit of Hutchison trivia
A few years back one of my professors was asked to do an interview on Hutchison for the Discovery channel; as part of this process, he was given some of Hutchison's videos purportedly documenting the "Hutchison effect." They're astonishingly low-quality hoaxes. Apart from cases where you can see strings, his videos also depict objects glued to the ceiling and just sitting on the floor, but with the camera flipped upside-down. So he's at least got some diversity in his methods for faking floating objects.TallMan (talk) 14:36, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
" If , at all, an object on earth defies gravity all of a sudden ( as claimed by John Hutchison ) , it wouldn't go up , perpendicular to the surface of earth, but will travel at a speed of 465.4084 m/s , tangential to the surface of earth due to inertia , since earth itself is rotating about it's own axis ! " -Akash Bhoir (Mumbai University)
Hey, John! How are you? (Lol) You needn't worry about individuals here claiming you have made many claims. We know they are few, and these are just the simpleminded gainsayers. Yes, there is documented support and collaborative evidence for John's few claims. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5zbTnfGe3E) Support type? Undeniable expertise in Dr. Judy Wood's related and collaborated discoveries and first hand observations. You are reading every declarative sentence John makes as a new claim; naive, discursive counting of apples and oranges at best! See the following documentary for support and elaboration/application of John's major claim. And quit being so childlike in simplicity and completely lacking in methodology for critical analysis for only slanderous reporting purposes - because you leave a shallow motive behind that is wide open for all to view in the capsule of what you only allege. Indeed a troll wrote the first paragraph of this article without even the veneer of an attempt at support. The real question is what the editorial staff of this site thinks of shallow, mallicious reporting, i.e., not even up to British standards of literary criticism of mere prose).
Hutchison fun facts:
Hutchison has been in over 300 shows over the years, and discovery channel and national geographic multiple times. The original videos were shot in the late 1970's and early 1980's with John's super 8 video recorder. (what did you expect, 1280 HD?) John has added documented evidence on his websites and youtube of his connections with NASA engineers, and his experiments with the US Army. Contrary to what someone put on the title of this page, John never worked for the army. He was invited to Los Alamos to conduct experiments. Contrary to what someone put on the title of this page, John has not lived in Vancouver since the late 1980's. In fact, he left Canada years ago. Contrary to what someone put on the title of this page, John has never said he forgot anything. He claims, and always has, to know exactly what is used, and how its done. Contrary to what someone put in the opening paragraph, John has never sold footage for 100$ a tape. Where is he supposedly selling these? John was asked by the Mayor of New Westminster to not perform any experiments the would emit any non licensed radio emmissions outside of his walls. In an attempt to comply, yet still film for Puttkamer, the voltage was transferred by a wire, not wirelessly as were his original levitation. In a subsequent production being filmed in his lab, John did break that agreement, and the Mayor shortly thereafter had the fire chief condemn his apartment lab, and force him to move. John then sold that apartment lab on ebay to a group of German scientists, who demanded a demonstration. He filmed this demonstration. This entire article has been taken nearly verbatim from the real wikipedia, from which it was removed for bias, no citations, and obvious errors and slander that can be confirmed with 5 minutes of browsing the internet. This action violates the wikipedia.org copyright. Fact: Trolls commonly use sites like wikipedia, facebook, and youtube to promote their uneducated bias. Even this dumping ground. Someone is pretending, a few years ago, their professor, sure. This fellow whi copied and pasted this article from wikipedia.org, never had a professor, because he never got that far in school. This page is a failed attempt at starting urban legends and defamation of character.
This is just a piece of shit. I will stop by all the time and delete it for being of non fact. For a group of people who CLAIM to be against bullshit, your hypocrites, and copy/paste full of shit fictional articles with no solid references, or citations. Because there is no bias philosophy on this site, members believe they can just smear bullshit fake facts. Any admin that would like to examine the points above, can find out quickly, that some troll put this here to attack Hutchison. Nothing more, the article has no merit, value, or substantiated facts.
All this aside, fact is, the copyright for this bull crap belongs to wikipedia.org, why is it here? it says right below, Do not submit copyrighted work unless you have permission. here is the link to the archive of the stolen content. The wikipedia.org license has not been followed here, the source has not been provided, just hacked together by a troll and reposted here.
- Hey John, how are you? Got any sources for your many claims, by any chance? 126.96.36.199 (talk) 13:32, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hey, John! How are you? (Lol) You needn't worry about individuals here claiming you have made many claims. We know they are few, and these are just the simpleminded gainsayers. Indeed a troll wrote the first paragraph of this article with not even the veneer of an attempt at support. The real question is what the editorial staff of this site thinks of shallow reporting, i.e., not even up to British standards of literary criticism of prose)! — Unsigned, by: Ian Bouystress / talk / contribs