|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
Talk:KassieDill
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Same question I had elsewhere. Is this a person of note? Or just a random christian on youtube?
If they are of note, of course they deserve Mainspace. but if they are just one more of millions of creationists on youtube, I feel as if we really should find a way to group them together for those who like that sort of thing, but not make it a focus on mainspace.--
En attendant Godot 21:01, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- Godot, I have tried for a long time to get cruft like this excised from the wiki, but somebody always cries about it. At this point, I want to at least bring the writing up to a reasonable level; it's embarrassing enough that we have so many articles on one obscure subculture; they should at least be readable. P-Foster (talk) 21:04, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think having them is bad at all. I think having them in mainspace is probably not the best answer. Again, as long as the system can handle it, having them doesn't harm anything. But my real problem, as a user, is I'm left with really no idea how relevant these vlogers (? - i'm old, i don't you tube) are, or how obscure. I came back to RW because someone linked your article on SomeoneFangXsomething. so having it, if the person is relevant, isn't bad. and yes, i get the whole "readable" thing. --
En attendant Godot 21:07, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think having them is bad at all. I think having them in mainspace is probably not the best answer. Again, as long as the system can handle it, having them doesn't harm anything. But my real problem, as a user, is I'm left with really no idea how relevant these vlogers (? - i'm old, i don't you tube) are, or how obscure. I came back to RW because someone linked your article on SomeoneFangXsomething. so having it, if the person is relevant, isn't bad. and yes, i get the whole "readable" thing. --
- Godot, I have tried for a long time to get cruft like this excised from the wiki, but somebody always cries about it. At this point, I want to at least bring the writing up to a reasonable level; it's embarrassing enough that we have so many articles on one obscure subculture; they should at least be readable. P-Foster (talk) 21:04, 23 June 2011 (UTC)