Talk:Nuclear magnetic resonance

As there was no talk page comment, I figured I'd do the "mission" thing here anyway.:

• It's science and you may just learn something.
• It's a real application of magnets to go alongside things like "magnetic therapy" (something I've been meaning to expand for some time and keep forgetting to do).

^narchist 18:55, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

It is real science, and we may just learn something, but wouldn't a wikipedia link do the job? Totnesmartin (talk) 21:32, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Seems reasonable to keep "pure sciency" stuff if it's strongly related to an area of woo or controversy, such as is the case for Evolution. I'm not sure that NMR fits that category. --^{Ask me about your mother} 15:31, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Yup, of course I totally missed Arm's comments about magnetic therapy. It would seem on mission to me given that context. --^{Ask me about your mother} 15:33, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Well, I'd like to keep it as part of a wider mini-project on magnetism that I was wanting to do and still want to do at some point. ^narchist 16:09, 21 February 2010 (UTC)