Talk:Nutmeg

I'm not convinced that we need this. It's not actually analysing or refuting anything, & it implies that nutmeg's primary function is as a drug, which it ain't. Wéáśéĺóíď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 16:40, 7 March 2009 (EST)

It's for silly kids who can't get to the shop to buy a cake, so they have to make one. Delete or funificatalise, preferably the former. Totnesmartin 17:03, 7 March 2009 (EST)

It's a joke, sillys. Drug humor is now verboten on this site? Secret Squirrel 17:05, 7 March 2009 (EST)

No it isn't - it's just that we didn't see any. Totnesmartin 17:10, 7 March 2009 (EST)

So what's the plan now? A one-sentence stub is worse than useless. If there's nothing else to say about nutmeg, this should be either deleted or merged into another article: drug or marijuana (due to the comparison made in the text), or create an article on "legal highs" or something. Wéáśéĺóíď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 17:33, 7 March 2009 (EST)

A one-sentence stub is worse than useless, but then again, so is nutmeg. I can has article on banana peels too? Secret Squirrel 17:45, 7 March 2009 (EST)

We could do a Felidae here, and work them into a larger crap drugs article. Totnesmartin 17:58, 7 March 2009 (EST)

How's this: purported legal highs ? Secret Squirrel 18:10, 7 March 2009 (EST)