There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2020.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
Fancy theology words
Now a small minority of smart people will probably understand what "autokephalous" or some such means, but the vast majority will not. Would you please write an article non-theologians can follow? Because if I want to dig through twenty wikipedia articles on long dead church fathers, I have wikipedia for that. Worzelpete (talk) 01:07, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Do it right
Delete reason: Hopelessly tiny stub — Having an article on the Oriental Orthodox church isn't a bad idea. But please, create said article with some substance. We're not a general encyclopedia, FYI. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 13:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)