RationalWiki's 2020 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $1680Goal: $3500

Talk:Sample size

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon science.svg

This science related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Steelbrain.png

In particle physics and, to some extent, cosmology, a five sigma significance is required to claim a discovery. Popular recent examples are the discovery of the Higgs Boson, and the now discredited discovery of E modes in the cosmic microwave background. Is that of some significance for this article? --87.145.134.96 (talk) 16:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

If not here, than in the statistical significance article which, oddly, isn't linked to this one. It's a good point that acceptable levels of error vary by discipline. MarmotHead (talk) 17:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)