There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Second Epistle to Timothy
EDIT CONFLICT!! Barack Obama 15:20, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
I'd like to argue that these links to various Bible books as "guide to Timothy", "guide to 2 Timothy" be joined into several Major Catiogries. Personally, I'd put all of the Letters of Paul into on page with three sections 1) Authentic letters of paul, 2)Letters known to be written by others, and 3) status in doubt. I would also put the (pardon my hebrew here, this is from memory) nithivm(?) and kethuvum(?) (History and Prophets) into single topics unless someone has something specific they want to say about any given book.
I have some decent knowledge in the field, but that's a lot of books to comment on. Just a suggestion.--WaitingforGodot 15:21, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Probably a good idea. Personally, I'd hate having to summarize every single epistle individually. Not that they're not interesting each in their own way, but... --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 15:30, 15 July 2008 (EDT)