2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $9223.37Goal: $10000

Talk:Tom Ruffles

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Feedback (also, mission relevance?)[edit]

Some feedback from the article's subject: http://tomruffles.blogspot.com/2015/01/on-discovering-that-i-have-rationalwiki.html He's right in one - the current text of the article doesn't make clear why there should be a RW article about him. Distant involvement in Wikipedia drama is not a reason for inclusion, neither is RW a database of the members of paranormal societies. And the "conspiracy theories" bit stretches the term into near-meaninglessness.--ZooGuard (talk) 18:19, 31 January 2015 (UTC)