Template:Ken debate

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Dear Anonymous User at a rather liberal website,

RE: Your previous comment which I ignored due to the utter weakness of the atheist position and strength of the Christian position

1. You and your co-obese atheists at a rather liberal website starting with an R have such flabby midsections that you are mentally incapable of find even one piece of evidence that we are inaccurate or incorrect in Conservapedia's articles that focus on atheism, evolution, or homosexuality, which were all largely my work. Taking into consideration the simple fact that there is no proof or evidence that any of these worldviews are true and correct, it wasn't considerably challenging for us to create some articles that actively attempt to offer arguments pertaining to these worldviews.

2. I expertly crushed Anonymous User and their fellow probably-obese atheists on the talk pages of the Conservapedia articles that they were rather unsurprisingly angered by, plus on other places on the internet as well (atheism, evolution, homosexuality, etc.) Taking this into account, your claim that I am afraid to debate has no merit. I am most clearly not claiming that it is pertaining to my excellent debating prowess that I won so many debates with you folks from a certain website starting with an R, it is just that atheism is such an incredibly weak position with a glass jaw and a flabby midsection - especially compared to Christianity, which, however, has overwhelming evidence to support it.

3. I met my goals that I sought to achieve in terms of my participation with Conservapedia, the Trustworthy Encyclopedia. Anything else that I do further is just icing on the cake.

4. Encyclopedias are almost always supposed to involve multiple editors and personally, I haven't seen a single encyclopedia that I fully agree with. Feel free to yell in anger like a baby at Conservapedia and find cracks in it, but I really don't think that you can find a single piece of evidence that we are inaccurate or incorrect in the Conservapedia articles in regards to atheism, evolution, or homosexuality.

5. I know that it aggravates to no end that I have met my goals and hereby declare VICTORY, since I have the ability as a Conservapedia sysop to block anyone who has the nerve to attempt to turn Conservapedia into a liberally-biased mob rule like Wikipedia, and yet you still want to find fault in me. However, I have still succeeded in being more like my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ once and for all, in that I have delivered yet another punch to your flabby midsection! You on the other hand, have also succeeded at being more like your Lord and Savior David Silverman, in that you also love attacking and insulting Christians in public, and more importantly, you also probably enjoy raping and harassing women (in regards to that, the Leftists were right for once)!

In regards to all of that, I hereby challenge you to A SECOND WRITTEN DEBATE. In this debate, I challenge you to prove to me that atheism is true and correct (which you probably won't be able to do anyway, due to the inherent glass jaw of atheism), and once I achieve victory, it will all but destroy atheism on the internet ONCE AND FOR ALL!!!

However, it will only be under THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS (in bold):

  • In case you attempt to martyr me in your anger as a result of my inevitable VICTORY, I get to bring with me a largely defensive weapon of gun.
  • You are to pay an exact total of $45,000.00 $5,000,000, which will be donated by a trustworthy bible-believer of your choosing to a faith-based Christian charitable organization of your choosing upon successful completion of the debate.
  • The debate will be written, and will be 20 hours long (which can be broken up over a 110 month period).

6. Well so long, you obese, militant, atheistic, and probably homosexual commie! Oh, and one more piece of Christian love for Horrible Anonymous User: I wish that your mother had just aborted you, you ugly, disgusting pig!

DISCLAIMER: It's not that I hate you, it's just that I don't want you to exist. >:-b