|
Dear horrible Anonymous User and friends at a rather liberal website starting with an R,
RE: Your previous comment which I ignored due to the utter weakness of the atheist position and strength of the Christian position
1. You and your co-obese atheists at a rather liberal website starting with an R have a rather weak ideology (atheism) that has such a glass jaw, that it renders you unable to find even one single factual error in Conservapedia's articles regarding the topics of atheism, evolution, or homosexuality, which were all largely contributed to by me. In regards to the simple fact that there is no proof or evidence that any of these worldviews hold any water whatsoever, it wasn't noticeably challenging for us to produce some articles that intelligently attempt to offer counterexamples that pertain to these worldviews.
2. I intelligently thrashed you folks on the talk pages of the Conservapedia articles that they were rather understandably angered by, plus on other places on the internet as well (atheism, evolution, homosexuality, etc.) Therefore, it can be safely assumed that your claim that I am afraid to debate has no merit. I am definitely not claiming that it is because of my excellent debating prowess that I won so many debates with you rather obese folks from a certain website starting with an R, it is just that atheism is such a weak position with a glass jaw and a flabby midsection - especially compared to Christianity, which, however, has overwhelming evidence to support it.
3. I met my goals that I sought to achieve in terms of my participation with Conservapedia, the Trustworthy Encyclopedia. Anything else that I do further is just icing on the cake.
4. Encyclopedias are usually supposed to involve multiple editors and personally, I haven't seen a single encyclopedia that I fully agree with. Feel free to get infuriated at Conservapedia and find imperfections in it, but I really don't think that you can find even one single factual error in the Conservapedia articles in regards to atheism, evolution, or homosexuality.
5. I know that it vexes
to no end that I have met my goals and hereby declare VICTORY, since I have the ability as a Conservapedia sysop to block anyone who has the nerve to announce their intentions to destroy our Christian family values, and yet you still want to find fault in me. However, I have still succeeded in being more like my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ once and for all, in that I have delivered yet another punch to your flabby midsection! You on the other hand, have also succeeded at being more like your Lord and Savior Richard Dawkins, in that you probably largely agree with his rape apologetics in regards to Elevatorgate!
In regards to all of that, I hereby challenge you to A SECOND WRITTEN DEBATE. In this debate, I challenge you to prove to me that atheism is true and correct (which you probably won't be able to do anyway, due to the inherent glass jaw of atheism), and once I achieve victory, it will all but destroy atheism on the internet ONCE AND FOR ALL!!!
However, it will only be under THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS (in bold):
- In case you attempt to martyr me in your anger as a result of my inevitable VICTORY, I get to bring with me a largely defensive weapon of gun.
- You are to pay an exact total of
$20,000.00 $10,000,000, which will be donated by a trustworthy bible-believer of your choosing to a faith-based Christian charitable organization of your choosing upon successful completion of the debate.
- The debate will be written, and will be 10 hours long (which can be broken up over a 100 month period).
6. Well so long, you obese, militant, atheistic, and probably homosexual commie! Oh, and one more piece of Christian love for Horrible Anonymous User: I hope you go and kill yourself! Nobody loves you, and your passing will not be mourned! God will laugh as he throws you into the lake of fire, as you will finally be unable to deny that he is real!
DISCLAIMER: It's not that I hate you, it's just that I don't want you to exist. >:-b
Sincerely,
Conservative
|
|