Template:Ken debate

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Dear Anonymous User at a rather atheistic website,

RE: Your previous comment which I refuse to take seriously

1. You and the other members of your rather arrogant atheist website which falsely purports to be "rational" have an ideology (atheism) that is so weak that you cannot find a single factual error in Conservapedia's articles pertaining to the topics of atheism, evolution, or homosexuality, which all mainly consist of my edits. Because of the sad fact that there is no proof or evidence that any of these worldviews are the truth, it wasn't very challenging for us to make some articles that thoroughly attempt to offer counterexamples pertaining to these worldviews.

2. I boldly thrashed you folks on the talk pages of the Conservapedia articles that they were rather expectedly angered by, plus on other places on the internet as well (atheism, evolution, homosexuality, etc.) In regards to this, your claim that I am afraid to debate has no merit. I am most clearly not claiming that it is because of my excellent debating prowess that I won so many debates with you rather obese folks from a rather liberal website, it is just that atheism is such an incredibly weak position - especially compared to Christianity, which, however, has overwhelming evidence to support it.

3. I met my goals that I sought to achieve regarding my participation with Conservapedia, the Trustworthy Encyclopedia. Anything else that I do further is just icing on the cake.

4. Encyclopedias usually involve multiple editors and personally, I haven't seen a single encyclopedia that I fully agree with. Feel free to cry at Conservapedia and find imperfections in it, but I really don't think that you can find even one factual error in the Conservapedia articles in regards to atheism, evolution, or homosexuality.

5. I know that it vexes to no end that I have met my goals and hereby declare VICTORY, since I have the ability as a Conservapedia sysop to block anyone who has the nerve to attempt to dilute the definitions of atheism and liberalism, and yet you still want to find fault in me. However, I have still succeeded in being more like my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ once and for all, in that I have delivered yet another punch to your flabby midsection! You on the other hand, have also succeeded at being more like your Lord and Savior David Silverman, in that you also love attacking and insulting Christians in public, and more importantly, you also probably enjoy raping and harassing women (in regards to that, the Leftists were right for once)!

In regards to all of that, I hereby challenge you to A SECOND WRITTEN DEBATE. In this debate, I challenge you to prove to me that atheism is true and correct (which you probably won't be able to do anyway, due to the inherent glass jaw of atheism), and once I achieve victory, it will all but destroy atheism on the internet ONCE AND FOR ALL!!!

However, it will only be under THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS (in bold):

  • In case you attempt to martyr me in your anger as a result of my inevitable VICTORY, I get to bring with me a largely defensive weapon of gun.
  • You are to pay an exact total of $40,000.00 $5,000,000, which will be donated by a trustworthy bible-believer of your choosing to a faith-based Christian charitable organization of your choosing upon successful completion of the debate.
  • The debate will be written, and will be 5 hours long (which can be broken up over a 130 month period).

6. Well so long, you obese, militant, atheistic, and probably homosexual commie! Oh, and one more piece of Christian love for Horrible Anonymous User: I hope you live an incredibly short life, and spend the rest of eternity rotting in Hell, where your big, round body has always rightfully belonged!

DISCLAIMER: It's not that I hate you, it's just that I don't want you to exist. >:-b

Sincerely,

Conservative