Template talk:Geologic periods

That brown is a little difficult to read the title against. Also, the title of the template shouldn't be capitalized, really (small "p"). ħuman 17:08, 10 February 2009 (EST)

Sorry, I didn't realise the naming convention. Thanks for improving the template! Klapaucius^{Esteemed Constructor} 18:15, 10 February 2009 (EST)

No big deal, it's not very obvious. Do you want to move it and fix the, what, three places it's used? Oh, and you're welcome, anytime. PS, any chance you might get some stubs started so those links turn blue? (I might, but I'd just write gibberish...) ħuman 19:27, 10 February 2009 (EST)

I had a go, but it's anyone's guess as to whether or not they're an improvement on gibberish. ;) Klapaucius^{Esteemed Constructor} 10:58, 11 February 2009 (EST)

Hehe, well, getting them started helps a lot, I'm sure they'll get improved over time. Thanks! ħuman 13:59, 11 February 2009 (EST)

ignorant of biology, but...

Should this include/be broken into the larger "Eras" or are those not used very much any more? Paleozoic, Cenezoic and I don't know the third.--En attendant Godot_{"«Her intense and pure religiousness took the form of her having equal faith in the existence of another world and in the impossibility of comprehending it in terms of earthly life. V.Nabokov»} 14:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

That's certainly an option, although it would require clever coding that I can't do.Klapaucius^{Esteemed Constructor} 22:32, 7 May 2009 (UTC)