Template talk:Race troll

More than just one article

I just tweaked the wording so I could use this template on a BoN who smudged some race-related articles. Hope I didn't break anything. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 13:14, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Just call the nasty scientist names. Liberal garbage 101. 218.152.128.52 (talk) 13:16, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Michael Behe is a scientist, and we call him all sorts of names. Just because you're an alleged scientist doesn't mean you're not full of shit. Your edits are nothing more than the same racist PRATTs we've refuted over and over again. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 18:23, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

LMAO. You merely ban and revert the same obvious nonsense back into your liberal garbage articles. You haven't "refuted" anything and in fact are incapable of doing so, because you are wrong. I think you have a boner for "refuting" creationism (IOW parroting the arguments of those smarter than you), and think that carries to "refuting" anything else you turn your "mind" to. It doesn't. You are a fuckwit. 61.41.36.44 (talk) 19:16, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Oh hi! You're very cute when insult me like that. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 22:02, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Did someone just call RW articles "liberal garbage?" I thought everyone knew they were written by aspie fascists, who might just resemble that asseveration. I don't know whether to laugh or drink, —ignorant and apathetic, 23:20, 6 October 2013 (UTC)