Template talk:Unmerged

This should also allow for a link to the archive in question at RW:dup. art. ħuman 19:09, 10 October 2008 (EDT)

Maybe. . . . weaseLOId~ 19:38, 10 October 2008 (EDT)

The point being, the reason we are doing this is to preserve the history, not to show that another article name redirects. Right now, it doesn't even say "&redirect=no", so when you click on the link you go to the "current" page. So it takes three clicks to get to the history. So, first, there should be a link to the "old" article history. Then, doesn't it make sense to have a direct link to the archived discussion? I guess not, really. The history is what matters. I'll see if I can fix the link so it goes straight there. Brain cramp, wrong template. Yes, we should have a link to when we decided, and how, to not merge the articles. It should be easy, as long as we remove the markup from the header. ħuman 21:06, 10 October 2008 (EDT)