Why revert this?

Hey yo, just wondering why you reverted this edit. Since the content in that section only responds to the question posited in the section header by saying "No, because the Supreme Court established this and that" and says nothing in reaction to the ID idiocy in the section to the left, I thought I'd add something that more directly addressed the text in that section. 84.198.53.190 (talk

I had no problem with the content of the edit itself, it just seemed a bit too ad hominem for one of our top-rated articles for my liking, which is why I reverted it. However, I am willing to re-consider.