User:Bayes/CPpage

{{userboxtop}} {{user caffeine}} {{user enAmer}} {{user evolutionScience}} {{user faithscience}} {{Userbox |border-c=#FFD700 |border-s=3 |id-c=#000000 |id-s=14 |id-fc=#000000 |info-c=#660099 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#FFD700 |id= |info=This user thinks the [[Minnesota Vikings|Vikings]] should start him at quarterback.}} {{user free software}} {{user LaTeX}} {{user mac}} {{user binary}} {{user nodino}} {{User previewfirst}} {{user Socrates}} {{userboxbottom}}

"Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem." --John Ponce

My 2 cents

• Quotes should be used to support a particular thesis, not compose a thesis.
• Opposing arguments should be honestly and completely defined before attempting to refute them.

My perception of Conservapedia

What Conservapedia could be

• A place for discussion of conservative ideas.
• A place for someone to go to get the conservative perspective, especially on high-profile issues.

What Conservapedia is

• A groupthink-based project that essentially functions to stoke those who already subscribe to the American fundamentalist Christian philosophy, rather than to engage in dialog with those who do not.
• A haven from which to launch attacks on people and belief systems different from that ideology.
• A place where scholarship contrary perceived as contrary to that ideology is maligned, rather than respected, discussed, and honestly argued against.

My table of contents

=== Conservatism and Liberalism === {|style="width:75%; background:#F0F8FF" align="center" border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="1" |- ! List of entries about liberals ! List of articles about conservatives |- | [[Liberal deceit]], redirects to [[deceit]] | [[Conservative deceit]], presumably would be redirected to [[deceit]] as well |- | [[Liberal hypocrisy]], in the mainspace | [[Essay: Conservative hypocrisy]], moved to the "Essay" namespace |- | [[Liberal bias#Examples of Liberal Style|Liberal style]], now an element of the liberal bias article | [[Conservative style]], no article |- | [[Essay:Liberal Intellectualism]] | [[Essay:Conservative Intellectualism]], wiped clean and protected |- | [[Liberal tools]] | [[Conservative tools]], no article |- | [[Liberal Hysteria]] | [[Conservative Hysteria]], no article |- | [[Liberal bias]], which [[Bias in Wikipedia|Wikipedia is alleged to be rife with]] | [[Conservative bias]], [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_Bias&diff=next&oldid=292863 mentioning Conservapedia not allowed] |}

Articles that could use a better representation of the topic at hand before the refutation kicks in

*[[Theory of Evolution]] *[[Theory of Relativity]] *[[Atheism]] *[[Abortion]] *[[Homosexuality]] *[[Communism]] *[[Richard Dawkins]]

The Gay Section (listed in no particular order)

An asterisk (*) indicates the articles that I personally think are worth having in an encyclopedia. That doesn't that mean I necessarily endorse their current content. {| style="width:100%" |- | [[Gay]]* | [[Homosexual agenda]]* | [[Homosexual Couples and Domestic Violence]] |- | [[Homosexual Public Indecency Tolerated in San Francisco]] | [[Homosexual behavior]] | [[Homosexual agenda in Scotland]] |- | [[Homosexual rights advocacy]]* | [[Homosexual acts]] | [[Gay Bomb]] |- | [[Homosexuality]]* | [[Homosexuality and AIDS]] | [[Homosexuality and Genetics]] |- | [[Homosexuality and Gonorrhea]] | [[Homosexuality and Marriage]]* | [[Homosexuality and Mental Health]] |- | [[Homosexuality and Parasites]] | [[Homosexuality and Promiscuity]] | [[Homosexuality and Religious Liberty]] |- | [[Homosexuality and Syphilis]] | [[Homosexuality and free will]] | [[Homosexuality and genetics]]* |- | [[Homosexuality in Animals Myth]] | [[Gay Bowel Syndrome]] | [[Gay disease]] |}

The "Are You Kidding Me" Section

*[[Gay Bomb]] and its [[Talk:Gay Bomb|talk page]].