User:Griffirg

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Atom.jpg
This user is not afraid to call their Higher Power by its proper name: physics.


Atom.jpg
This user thinks that evolution explains the origin of species.
MagicCreation.jpg
This user believes that "Magic man done it" isn't science.


Universe expansion.png
This user thinks that the Big Bang explains the origin of the Universe.
Atom.jpg This user does not believe in so-called "tolerance" when it compromises truth.
Christopher Hitchens crop 2.jpg
"That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."
Usa flag circle.png This user reads Wackopedia Conservapedia for amusement
Conservlogo late april.png
This user believes in free speech for everyone - even idiots.
Gay Pride Flag.svg
This user believes in equal rights for gay people.
Bevan.jpg
This user believes in the
National Health Service
Redrose.svg This user is a socialist.


Political compass small logo.gif
This user's Political Compass coordinates are (-8.62,-8.15).
UKflag.PNG
This user is proud to be British!

Student in my last year before Uni, studying Maths Physics and Technology. In Northern Ireland. Atheist

Have a Cp account under the same name. Orginally intended to correct some of the more stupid and unscientific suggestions made by people there (I think, cant remember, was on impulse), but got bored, so just use it to follow and laugh at the more stupid but long standing pet projects. made a total of 3 edits on talk pages, one of which was me being predantic on talk best new conservative words, by suggesting to make it in terms of years, no idea why i did it though. My other 2 posts are on Talk Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge, both times explaining why it wasn't science, in as simple terms as I could, concerntrating on andy's delusions relating to jesus walking on water being 'Quantum mechanics' in the first one, and with the second one, more or less giving a detailed explaination of most of the supposed foreknowledge, and my reasons for them not being s. Both of these posts were countered with non sequiturs by andy, the first about there being other types of waves (dealt with in second post, and the second about how what particles do atomic levels (he should have included sub-atomic levels to make it consistant with all i said) should work at a larger scale, because one can observe an apple falling from a tree and assume it can relate to planetary motion. I am quite sure i dealt with the assumption cant be made in the second post.