User talk:

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi. I think I've been blocked by mistake. This is Seoul National Library.— Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs 08:19, 17 February 2015 (UTC)‎

The block should be about to expire today or early tomorrow.--ZooGuard (talk) 08:36, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
If this is true, your library was recently visited by a noted anti-Semitic racist. If you wish to avoid bans in the future, you can ban the person who made the edits that led to the ban from the library. (talk) 08:42, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Oh. How would I do that? (talk) 08:42, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Can you give examples of anti-Semitic and racists comments and his/her personal details. (talk) 08:44, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
A list of their edits can be found here. The person alleged to be using your IP is known as Mikemikev. Feel free to Google that name for more info. (talk) 08:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Which edit is most racist and anti in your opinion? (talk) 08:55, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
I want to pick the worst one so he definitely gets banned. (talk) 08:56, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
He's saying you are anti-White. This is confusing. Who is lying? (talk) 08:58, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
From your IP? Probably this one where he suggests anyone that doesn't buy into the ridiculous conspiracy theory that white people are at risk of being genocided is to be put up against a wall and shot. (talk) 09:02, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
He didn't say that. He was quite precise in his language. You understand that it's a serious crime to try to get someone banned by lying about them. (talk) 04:21, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
I'm beginning to suspect that at least the last couple of posts are by Mikemikev again. Seriously, look at the last one. To claim that is lying when Mikemikev wrote "I can say that you should be put up against a wall and shot, after a fair trial under a new govenment, of course", and then the suspected Mikemikev has the gall to whine about how "it's a serious crime to try to get someone banned by lying about them." Oh really? And how does lying and extremely thinly veiled death threats (the earlier one in the same thread, "You are anti White scum and you should be put up against a wall and shot", wasn't even prefaced with the odd legalese disclaimer of the cited example) score on the "it's a serious crime"-scale?
But back to the topic of the original post on this talkpage: I think that Seoul National Library users will just have to live with periodically not being able to anonymously editing RW. While I doubt that this is going to upset a whole lot of the library's users, I will still offer an apology (for what little it's worth) for this unfortunate collective punishment. ScepticWombat (talk) 07:05, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Information icon.svg This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it.

We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.