User talk:Kels/Spellchecked Genesis

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Can you highlight the spelling mistaeks? I'm too bored to read through the entire text, and then compare it to my KJV genesis. User:Theemperor/Sig/Sig 20:11, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

No. If someone wants to volunteer, that's no problem, but I ain't doin' it. --Kels 20:12, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
It's probably a bit more fun not to see them coming. He beat his sons and daughters indeed... Scarlet A.pngtheist 20:15, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
My personal favourite is 15:21. --Kels 20:19, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Oh, and give a look at 32:30. --Kels 21:03, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
My computer cannot handle this page. Can someone with a better computer break it down into smaller, more managable bits? Thank you. ĴάΛäšςǍ₰ my sig is my own opiate! 21:32, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Can I have your source for a wikiformatted Genesis? Thanks. User:Theemperor/Sig/Sig 21:44, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
I made it myself out of this, and then just did the dog work of formatting it after I ran the spellcheck. All I have saved is this version, though. --Kels 21:56, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Darth, I may be wrong, but I think we have the whole Bible wikified somewhere on the site, to support a "verse citing" template of some sort that I'm not sure Trent ever made really work. ħumanUser talk:Human 22:09, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, go [1], they're all near the top. ħumanUser talk:Human 22:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Oh, if someone feels this would fit better in mainspace or wherever, please be my guest. --Kels 22:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't care about mainspace, as I can't even read this article... ĴάΛäšςǍ₰ my sig is my own opiate! 22:16, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
I gathered that, but I don't even know if it's staying in my userspace. If it doesn't, it can get broken up somehow (I have no idea by what creteria) at that time. --Kels 22:22, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Break it into chunks by "topic"? Creation One, Creation Two, Flood, etc.?