RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2900Goal: $6000

User talk:Lily/AIG chap 4

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Well, it stars out passable, tails off in the middle, and less aid about the end the better... So, am I reading this right when it basically says "the age of the Earth according to the Bible varies, but let's gloss over this point, I want to show off by talking about what I learned about radiometric dating from Wikipedia and my own imagination and so the Bible is right because the Bible is infallible because the Bible tells us it's infallible" I just want to make sure I'm not mis-reading this because I've scanned down those closing paragraphs and can't find the join anywhere. Scarlet A.pngmoral 11:18, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I was intending to do a side-by-side refutation but if anyone wants to start the ball rolling then the original is here.  Lily Inspirate me. 11:57, 3 August 2010 (UTC)