There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:Oldman4
Coop
A case involving you has been raised at the Chicken Coop. Feel free to comment.
DuceMoosoliniYour friendly RW
dictator moderator 04:27, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Supporting your case in the Coop
Hi Oldman4. Are there really this many HDF employees that receive a regular salary outside of the small circle that journalists have verified? I briefly believed it for the much more important case of Wikipedia (see my comment above), but no longer personally think this it's very likely. I'm not sure if you've ever had to interact with any of these racialists before this one/the Roggenwolf Mikemikev stuff, but I kind of doubt most of them have to be paid to pursue their disgusting schemes. They're mostly unemployed cunts trying to bullshit their way into academia when they would otherwise not be smart enough. It's mostly about conservative prestige and their self-image. The rest of them are incels nobody would bother paying. Same thing with EDL or BNP extremists. Also, the Hope not Hate article fortunately meant that these HDF people may never get a large benefactor ever again. Let's hope this will be the case. I could also be wrong, though. Could you please collect your evidence that Ghost of Lonax receives money from them? Here or on HDF talk, I don't know. Would be a helpful addendum to the coop case and is likely to mean the moderators finally ban once they understand the context. KaDaShOvA (talk) 19:48, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- KaDaShOvA I have never claimed in public writing anywhere that Roggenwolf is a paid HDF employee, nor Mikemikev. The former claim was put on the "Ghost of Lomax" HDF website without any direct link to me. They couldn't support that claim with a single reliable reference to my account, then they made up nonsense that I was using an alternative IP address to make the claim. I have never attacked Roggenwolf anywhere, not in one edit. He admitted to me he had email communication with Kirkegaard. I said I didn't trust him.
- There are about 12 people working for the HDF, the rest like Jonathan Kane and Anatoly Karlin are "enablers". Kirkegaard runs various video calls and just gets idiots to do his dirty-work. Through Aporia, social media, Edward Dutton's podcast, other advertising and substacks they are easily making around $500,000 a year. They have plenty of $$ to pay gullible dupes to create attack websites.
- I have been given the information about who "owns" the "Ghost of Lomax" and it checks out. We know he is on the HDF payroll. For legal reasons I cannot disclose that information and a UK police report has been filed against him. Kane has admitted in his own words he contacted "Ghost of Lomax" and provided them with the diffs and links that have contributed to the harassment towards me. It doesn't make any-sense why he hasn't been banned here. He is actively involved with "Ghost of Lomax". I have 50 article creations here and many good edits going back years but apparently off-site harassment is allowed? Wikipedia has much better policy about off-site harassment. Over there if you do it you are quickly banned and may even be globally banned like Abd Lomax was. If Kane is not banned for this harassment, I will close my account here. It's not worth me commenting on the coop anymore. Let's see what happens. Oldman4 (talk) 00:58, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Interaction ban
This is a formal notice that you are hereby banned from interacting with Tetrapteryx.
Specifically, you are banned from doing the following actions:
- Edit their user talk page. This extends to subpages in their userspace and essay talkpages.
- Reply to them in discussions. Participation in the same discussions is still permitted, but direct responses are not.
- Reference them anywhere on RationalWiki, directly or indirectly.
- Revert their edits in any shape, way or form through the MediaWiki interface.
This sanction can be enforced by any sysop with incrementing blocks and attached talk page notices. Repeated violation may result in another Chicken coop or ATIM case being raised against you with the potential for further sanctions.
Plutocow (talk) 23:32, 15 February 2025 (UTC)