| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
User talk:UNO
I was arguing with some TERFs on Twitter and shit, but they started making some decent points, but I obviously don't want to be in "that side" of the issue or w/e, so I came here since this is the website that presented a clear and concise enough argument to get me to deconvert but I read the TERF article and it just completely glosses over or misrepresents the arguments. I've been arguing with TERFs that lived under Sharia, or victims of FGM and detransitioned people and shit talking about real shit all over the world, but the article just talks about Cathy Brennan a couple of times and has a random YouTuber at the bottom. I can't reconcile the cognitive dissonance and this site has provided no help at all... UNO (talk) 12:10, 6 March 2018 (UTC)