User talk:VolcanicBrimstone

Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, VolcanicBrimstone. This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble. We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives. Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you. If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be.

RationalWiki is not a place to publish your views after they have been rejected on Wikipedia. We have been through this before. Alec Sanderson (talk) 18:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes, we have been through this before. Mount Sinai was a mountain blazing with fire and smoke and Yahweh poured out rivers of fire and ate people up in this fire but he was not a volcano. I know, you know and Wikipedia knows. Thank goodness for logical thinking and intellectual honesty. (VolcanicBrimstone (talk) 18:48, 13 March 2015 (UTC))

Eh, you do realise that citing Immanuel Velikovsky and Sigmund Freud in favour of your volcano ideas doesn't exactly makes it look more sound, right?^{(In case you missed it, one was an outright crank and the other had zero expertise in the matter)} Likewise, the rest of the names you dropped indicates either out of date scholarship (Beke), lack of expertise (Humphreys), or refers to the very guy whose pet idea you're pushing (Dunn). Seriously, why did you think it would work here, when it didn't when you tried it (again) at Wikipedia? ScepticWombat (talk) 14:56, 16 March 2015 (UTC)