There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Category talk:Articles needing RWification
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
It's fun reloading this cat and watching the software slowly depopulate it... ħuman 16:59, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
- Slow evening? --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 17:14, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
- Well, it beats reloading RC over at CP, which is what everyone else does, right? Also, it's really amusing how it takes time for the change in the stub template to take effect. ħuman
18:06, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
- Well, it beats reloading RC over at CP, which is what everyone else does, right? Also, it's really amusing how it takes time for the change in the stub template to take effect. ħuman
Hey, wouldn't it make sense to rename this category 'Pages needing Rationalisation'? To RWify seems like a less strong verb. 153.107.193.206 (talk) 22:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)