There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Category talk:Entry point
I was going through google yesterday (the work I do means that I'm living the life promoted by the xkcd "compiling" cartoon) and pretty much all the "internet laws" are high up on the list. Though slapping the "entry point" category of each of them might be a bit much. Either way, is this cat even useful anymore? ArmondikoVbomination 11:31, 5 December 2008 (EST)
- This cat is unique in that it is defined by Trent's analysis of the server logs - in other words, articles that people come directly to from elsewhere. Anyway, I can here to suggest it be renamed "entry points", plural. ħuman
07:09, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Are these still true[edit]
Are these articles still entry points? I find it hard to believe for some, especially the ones related to CP. Is this page still useful? Tielec01 (talk) 07:20, 30 April 2015 (UTC)