Category talk:Fish

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Ain't this a bit lame? ħumanUser talk:Human 01:15, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, but it's accurate and to the point. Something we need more of. --Prim arthropleura.jpg 01:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
No it is not, it is another example mission creep and of the kind we have seen too many times; CUR's interests. - π 01:19, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
As far as I am aware, Tiktaalik is not a fish. Ace McWickedDisco Jesus 01:25, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Isn't it a part-time fish? ħumanUser talk:Human 01:36, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
No it is a genetically modified creature created in an antediluvian lab. - π 01:47, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
So it's a shif? ħumanUser talk:Human 02:26, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Wait- you're complaining about mission creep in a category? So what about the category Animal? --Prim arthropleura.jpg 15:08, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

At risk of agreeing with CUR again, it's only a bloody category. the only categories to abolish are those with one article (like this one on Wikipedia). btw This is not a call to create articles about different types of fish just to fill the category. Totnesmartin 15:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)