Category talk:Fish

Ain't this a bit lame? ħuman 01:15, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, but it's accurate and to the point. Something we need more of. -- 01:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

No it is not, it is another example mission creep and of the kind we have seen too many times; CUR's interests. - π 01:19, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

As far as I am aware, Tiktaalik is not a fish. Ace McWicked^{Disco Jesus} 01:25, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Isn't it a part-time fish? ħuman 01:36, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

No it is a genetically modified creature created in an antediluvian lab. - π 01:47, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

So it's a shif? ħuman 02:26, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Wait- you're complaining about mission creep in a category? So what about the category Animal? -- 15:08, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

At risk of agreeing with CUR again, it's only a bloody category. the only categories to abolish are those with one article (like this one on Wikipedia). btw This is not a call to create articles about different types of fish just to fill the category. Totnesmartin 15:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)