Category talk:Government incompetence

I didn't intend for this category to lend support to libertarianism. If an appropriate article were made, I would eagerly create a Category:Corporate incompetence. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 04:26, 3 January 2008 (EST)

I think the title should be "government incompetence". Incompetency is a rather awkward word. human 18:38, 6 April 2008 (EDT)

You're not wrong! SusanG 18:42, 6 April 2008 (EDT)

That's twice! human 18:49, 6 April 2008 (EDT)

Is incompetency even a word? SusanG 18:52, 6 April 2008 (EDT)

If not, it should be! --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 18:53, 6 April 2008 (EDT)

Come to think of it, isn't 'incompetency' a more formal legal term - as in being declared incapable of handling one's own affairs? --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 18:58, 6 April 2008 (EDT)

Firefox' spellchecker accepts it with no qualms. However, "spellchecker" is rejected. As are both of your user names. So, anyway, shall we rename this pig? (And as far as the suggested cat in the first line, I think Corporate malfeasance would make more sense.) human 19:34, 6 April 2008 (EDT)

Yes rename it. Totnesmartin 11:40, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

I think I got them all. ħuman 20:46, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

What, Pomemons? Totnesmartin 19:09, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Hehe, no, all the articles that needed their cat changed. Since cats can't be renamed, I couldn't rely on a redirect as an intermediate solution so I had to fix them all in one swell foop. ħuman 20:11, 11 October 2009 (UTC)