Category talk:HIGH priority articles

Duplicate category

Category:High priority. The cat High priority is used a few time around the wiki in dpl calls. Discuss. - π 04:08, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Eliminate old category. Тy^talk 04:09, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Okay, what about the dpl calls? They are mostly in portals example. All that header shit would be nice if we could replace it with a template, e.g, Template:Portal, so next time we only have to fix it in one place. - π 04:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Given the issues that dpl appears to have, I would say nix 'em. Тy^talk 04:20, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

I still like them, they give the portal focus. - π 04:27, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

So what is your plan of action? Тy^talk 04:30, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I added a link from the useful links thingy. If you want to create a template portal maybe make space for a future high priority or section or something - π 04:31, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Given my schedule for the next few days, you may have to wait a bit on that. Тy^talk 04:33, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Mine feels like that. I just got a new computer and I can do nothing whilst I set it up. - π 04:34, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

I have finals. Тy^talk 04:35, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Thesis and job interviews. - π 04:37, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Bad category name, also it's all talk pages. Who's bad idea was this? Never mind no need to own up, can we just remove whatever crap template is generating this garbage? ħuman 01:59, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

The rating template is added to talk pages only. The template is meant as a brief appraisal of articles, and therefore goes on talk pages.--"Shut up, Brx." 02:04, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

I know. Dumbest thing I have ever seen. That template is so fucking stupid and useless. Got a rebuttal for that? This category should die a humane death, and soon. ħuman 02:34, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

I've complained before that the priority ratings are arbitrary and ultimately meaningless. I was just explaining.--"Shut up, Brx." 03:26, 14 May 2012 (UTC)