There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
|Thread title||Replies||Last modified|
|Hydro-Plate Theory||2||16:57, 16 July 2016|
|Did you know?||0||02:07, 3 November 2015|
|You've been nominated!||0||03:26, 2 November 2015|
|Aspie fascism returns to RW||11||15:56, 4 July 2014|
|Tyrannical but not evil, I like!||3||12:46, 27 June 2014|
|How to move from LQT||1||03:45, 23 June 2014|
|But||0||03:19, 17 June 2014|
|Holy Crap||18||00:19, 17 June 2014|
|Hey Ty||0||20:19, 22 May 2013|
|Services||4||18:13, 6 May 2013|
|Deliberate Libel||2||10:53, 8 March 2013|
|You are a hero||9||04:53, 8 March 2013|
|Here's a toast to the Booty!||1||03:56, 5 March 2013|
|Warhammer 40K||13||17:18, 26 February 2013|
|Wiki projects||3||05:30, 26 February 2013|
|But how||5||01:11, 21 February 2013|
|Jindal madness||2||17:24, 17 February 2013|
|test||1||02:45, 17 February 2013|
|Vandal bagging||2||21:56, 15 February 2013|
|Special Pleading reversion||4||17:03, 14 February 2013|
I thought Dr. Browns Theory answered the question rather excellent. I was surprised to see supposed men of science bash it with out referring to evidence and then also making negative reference to God. Science is a religion. I am educated rather well and I thought this theory was excellent. Let's consider for a moment that Dr Brown is correct in that Jesus is real, which I believe in Jesus, if Dr brown is wrong he dies just like you. If you people who don't believe in Jesus are wrong, well you don't go where Dr Brown goes after judgement. I know the educational system brain washes people, but if you research the matter instead of taking the states education as fact the evidence will set you free. It's rather obvious if you research it and weigh the evidence. Remember most if not all of evolution is just a story. One kind has never been observed to change to another kind. I'm sure if you pray for Jesus to review himself to you and your being honest you will get an answer. But then as time moves forward you will doubt. But if you keep looking thru investigation prowess you will eventually know. I'm not crazy or a nut, I wish I were a good Christian saving souls but the flesh has a hold of me unfortunately. If my provoking so save just one of you n myself it's worth the time to type this.
I am tired of being oppressed by your relentless but productive wikignoming.
Yeah any activity is going to be very very sporadic as life is hectic.
Same here. Also, I feel like I am running out of fields of nonsense that I am particularly well versed in when it comes to creating new articles.
Ty, I am gratified beyond description to see that your retirement passed so quickly. Nebu, have you looked at our cog sci article lately? There has been some talk page activity, but I lost interest in responding.
You could always take to answering my inane questions about consciousness and the human brain...
(sorry Ty, I'll get off your talk page now)
Actually, I have to take that back, having re-discovered an old to-do list in my userspace. Although I have gotten quite a bit of it finished.
Step 1: Remove LiquidThreads from talk page.
Step 2: Create LQT archive page. Copy the wikicode from that page, changing as necessary to display the threads from only your userspace.
Step 3: Create prominent link to LQT archive on your talk page.
Congratulations, you've removed LiquidThreads from your talk page, while still preserving access to old discussions.
Well, some people are no longer active, some new faces have appeared. I'm not sure how this affects the ratios between the various opposed ideological and behavioural groups. (I'm sorry, I just tried to make sense of a certain user's writings and their style seems to have rubbed off onto me.)
I haven't seen you around in a while & only recently became aware you've actually "retired". I hope it's not for keeps. I'm not sure what brought it on, but don't take the usual wiki bullshit to heart. It would be good to see you around again sometime soon. Hope all is well with you.
Hello there, I see your user page states: "Hi, I do user renames, MW editing, category nonsense, template nonsense, ref finding, and other useless stuff. If you have heard of my other services it's best to PM me." Other services... so, do you do catering? I am looking for affordable catering (pasta, chicken, veggies, dessert), for about 45 - 60 guests, more or less, around the second weekend of May... how about it? Love ya! :-)
One thing about Tyrannis is that he is very handy to have around in case of an electrical failure, He can summon electricity as if by magic. Of course he probably wouldn't mention this due to his modesty (he's a political idealist).
Well, we hired the caterer, so we won't be needing your clam linguine after all, lol. But thanks for the offer. The event is this weekend, exciting! :-D I haven't been around here for quite a while, but now that I am, noticed that you have not been here either (last edit in early March? where are you?) - I hope all is well in your world. Love & hugs
Attention: (AKA) Tyrannis
As per the subject it seems you are actively engaging in the practice of promoting libel on Rational Wiki. Although we are unsure of your motivation for such action at the current time, we do feel it's pertinent that your actions are brought to the attention of RationalWiki founders/management.
Further, pursuant to your attempts to maintain slander/libel postings on Rational Wiki you may become the focus of joint litigation, and/or become the focus personally of further action in regard to the deliberate actions undertaken by yourself on behalf of RationalWiki to maintain slanderous information about a company and/or persons involved with said company. The information being questioned has not relevant reference and as such is nothing more than a personal rant, for which you have actively undertaken to maintain.
Thank you for deleting things written by people who were actually interested in the content of those articles.
There was a reference to "overwhelming support" for their deletion, but there is nothing on either of the talk pages. They should not be deleted.
Hey guys, maybe we can take this issue to the talk page for deleting all these articles? This doesn't need to end up in HCM if we can set aside a day or two to talk it over right?
Fair enough, and it must be frustrating to constantly have to revisit these issues but on the other hand some of these votes are not well represented, and it must be said that alot of this happened without great visibility to the wiki so maybe some people missed it?
Your username always makes me think of Tyranids, is that coincidence or do you play them?
I play Guard too. I have been in the process of repainting and converting my pewter Mordians for far too long.
Well, everything is in my parents' attic for the time being. Mostly been focusing on the RPG (RT) these past few years.
I play Imperial Guard and so do Sturmwächter and Dondrekhan. Do you want to get together and work on lists or tactics or sth?
Are there any particular projects here that need to be taken care of?
I'm looking to do sth useful, and seeing as my background is in history, that doesn't leave a lot of stuff.
Will i make it without one of the people I actively like on this website!? -cry-
Old editors never die, they just fade away.
So he's definitely gearing up for 2016, no bones about it. I will move to Britain or Canada before he inflicts himself on the U.S. Even Harper and Cameron and their respective clowns seem more agreeable.
I'll move too. He spent 86 days last year out of state of course he wants the Oval office. Also this.
"Even Harper and Cameron and their respective clowns seem more agreeable." That's a pretty low bar, considering the scary territory the GOP has gone into!
I don't believe Jindal will survive the grueling campaign trail, which I predict will start even earlier than it had last cycle. Louisiana has more pull than people realize, being home to a major port, and a big chunk of the oil industry, but the "Base" will go for some other equally crazy white evangelical.
Hi! You recently reverted my edit on Special Pleading. The sentence in question alternated between "s/he" and "he" referring to the same person. I changed it to "she" for the whole example, in order to fix the inconsistency and also because "s/he" is ungrammatical. But I'm new here, and "s/he" may be RationalWiki style (though I'm not sure I've seen it in other articles.) Even so, the example sentence should use the same pronoun throughout. Mind discussing on the Special pleading talk page?
Personally, I hate s/he as much as I hate Y/you and W/we notation. English does have non-gendered pronouns in the form of "they" and "their".