Category talk:Silly templates

Yes, they may be, but why a category for them? Seems like a waste of time. ħuman 01:26, 5 September 2008 (EDT)

How else to keep track of them? If someone wants to find all of the humourous templates on this site, I see no reason why they shouldn't be a click away. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:34, 5 September 2008 (EDT)

Still, no one will know how to find them. Why not discuss it with the community and see if there is agreement, before making a category that only you know about? ħuman 01:51, 5 September 2008 (EDT)

That describes practically every category. For that matter, it describes every template. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:56, 5 September 2008 (EDT)

The point is interconnectivity. Anybody who looks up any one template should be able to find all the other similar or related templates at the click of a button, instead of arduously hunting them down; it should be easy. And, yes, it does take a disproportionate amount of work now to make things easier later. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:56, 5 September 2008 (EDT)

But you are doing it arbitrarily and on your own. If you check with a few other people first, their ideas will improve yours and make sense of all of the work. As it is, how will people gain by your efforts? ħuman 01:58, 5 September 2008 (EDT)