Category talk:Very short article

Bootiful! 14:28, 17 September 2007 (EDT)

Should we be taking the VSA category off the ones moved to Fun? --Kels 14:33, 17 September 2007 (EDT)

My thoughts exactly. tmtoulouse ^torment 14:34, 17 September 2007 (EDT)

This is growing out of control..........who has the stomach to sort through this? tmtoulouse ^torment 15:30, 15 November 2007 (EST)

I will!!! Elassint Throw things at me

The main thing to do is to identify those articles that obviously should go into fun or be deleted. Thats the first step. tmtoulouse ^torment 15:36, 15 November 2007 (EST)

Are you a sysop? tmtoulouse ^torment 15:36, 15 November 2007 (EST)

Nope Elassint Throw things at me

Well if your willing to be a janitor i can make ya a janitor then. tmtoulouse ^torment 15:42, 15 November 2007 (EST)

I'd don't mind this tidying up lark... it distracts me from tidying my room. I'll help. what needs doing? Totnesmartin 15:49, 15 November 2007 (EST)

This page is now longer than most of the articles this category is intended for. Please stop making my brain hurt and making baby Jesus cry. Thank you. CЯacke®

What needs to happen first is any article that obviously does not belong in our main space either needs to be deleted or moved to "fun" thats basically the "first pass" for this category. tmtoulouse ^torment 15:51, 15 November 2007 (EST)

When deleting or moving it is important to check the "what links here" and remove or edit the links on those pages. tmtoulouse ^torment 15:53, 15 November 2007 (EST)

I promise not to delete any pages then. Mainly because I can't. Totnesmartin 15:55, 15 November 2007 (EST)

Let's not get too enthusiatic about deleting pages, shall we? Some of this stuff is actually relevant. --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 15:58, 15 November 2007 (EST)

A lot of this stuff would do better on [liberapedia Elassint Throw things at me 16:59, 15 November 2007 (EST)