RationalWiki's 2020 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $3500Goal: $3500

Category talk:We're on a mission from God

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

We have an awfully lot of cats that do the very same thing. Maybe we should start looking at the various categories and seeing which can be cut or merged, which need to be their own, which are subsets of others, etc. Pink mowse.pngGodotThe Peyote God awaits 21:27, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Yes, but this cat references a great movie. Therefore it must stay.--User:Brxbrx/sig 21:28, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Cool. I'm making category, Rosebuds, Maltese Falcons, African Queens, and People who don't give a damn about Scarlet. TyTy 22:23, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

So, are we depreciating this or what? Tytalk 15:29, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Okay, if you don't make "People who don't give a damn about Scarlett", I will. --Let Them Eat Cake (talk) 23:50, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Does this category apply to anyone who claims to be "on a mission from God", or only people who use it to justify irrational/unethical actions? For example, does Martin Luther King count because he was a devout Christian who often cited the Bible as the source of his nonviolent ideals, or does that not count because he wasn't making the claim for evil purposes? 99.226.160.54 (talk) 01:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)