Category talk:Weasels

^? - Wėąṣėḷőįď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 18:01, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

For you, my good sir. -- 18:07, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

There are any number of biographical articles that this category would fit. Totnesmartin 18:09, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Like? -- 18:11, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Politicians spring to mind as a general group, possibly a few creationists and conspiracy theorists too. Totnesmartin 18:15, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

That would be an insult to the resident weasel. -- 18:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

This really isn't a useful category. Wėąṣėḷőįď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 18:46, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Neither is mowses. -- 20:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Mowses was a short-lived fad & a whole bunch of them were made. It makes sense to keep them together. I don't think any category which contains only two or three items is really justified, unless it's on mission (or otherwise of wide appeal within the community) with the possibility to have more pages added to it, &/or there is no other appropriate category to put them in. The weasel pic is already in category:animal images, & I still don't know what the blue one is for, if anything. Wėąṣėḷőįď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 20:27, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Weasels will be the new mowses. -- 20:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Unlikely. Wėąṣėḷőįď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 21:24, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

I agree with someone who has less than fifty legs. ħuman 03:12, 24 May 2009 (UTC)