|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
Conservapedia talk:Deadly sins committed by sysops
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This needs to be moved to the CP namespace, if not the trash can. Justification for continued existence? ħuman
19:45, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
- CPify as the similar Commandments one by the same author got moved there. Possibly merge with that one. Some of it's entertaining, but the seven deadly sins isn't an everyday concept to most people. Totnesmartin 07:10, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
- I find it hard to tell what should be in which part of this site. Naturally I'd vote to keep, but if this does go, can I put on my userpage first and work on it there? Insert Name Here 07:14, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
- Additional:The main point of these two pieces was to point out that AS, as a public upholder of Christianity, is actually very un-Christian in his behaviour. I was just calling him out on it. Insert Name Here 07:28, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
- The concept is OK but needs more examples as it's a bit bare at present. My suggestion is to move to CP namespace but also change to 'Deadly sins committed by Conservapedia sysops' so it can include others as well as Aschfly. E.g. there are no real examples of lust by Schlafly on Conservapedia, but there are a few lecherous comments by Ed Poor here & there. Plenty of examples of wrath & pride by pretty much all of the sysops. weaseLOId
~ 07:42, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
- OK then - and of course it would definitely belong in the Conservapedia part. Insert Name Here 12:01, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
- The concept is OK but needs more examples as it's a bit bare at present. My suggestion is to move to CP namespace but also change to 'Deadly sins committed by Conservapedia sysops' so it can include others as well as Aschfly. E.g. there are no real examples of lust by Schlafly on Conservapedia, but there are a few lecherous comments by Ed Poor here & there. Plenty of examples of wrath & pride by pretty much all of the sysops. weaseLOId
- Additional:The main point of these two pieces was to point out that AS, as a public upholder of Christianity, is actually very un-Christian in his behaviour. I was just calling him out on it. Insert Name Here 07:28, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
- I find it hard to tell what should be in which part of this site. Naturally I'd vote to keep, but if this does go, can I put on my userpage first and work on it there? Insert Name Here 07:14, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
Delete[edit]
This is silly and really boils down to mindless mudslinging. Hell, most of the sins can't even be attributed to a sysop. Plus, are we any less guilty. We did this exercise on TRWIGOCP a while back asnd it was fun. Now it can die, yes? --PsyGremlinSiarad! 16:16, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, send this article down to hell! --Sir Onion Kneel before my vegetable might! 16:26, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- I was just about to argue that this should be undeleted (only two sysops in favour? tut, tut!) but then I read it through and decided to add to the delete pile. It's just another of those "good idea at the time" articles. Totnesmartin (talk) 14:00, 18 October 2010 (UTC)