Conservapedia talk:Differences with Wikipedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Move individual differences to subpages[edit]
The organization of these pages should be improved by putting the information about the individual differences in subpages of this page. 
ListenerXTalkerX 03:27, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Or trimmed into short subsections of the same page, in the spirit of a less CP-centric wiki? P-Foster (talk) 03:32, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- De-CP-ification should not really apply to the Conservapedia space, but the current pages are short enough that we probably do not even need to trim anything.
ListenerXTalkerX 03:41, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Shit, if they're short enough, then yeah, cram them all onto one page. P-Foster (talk) 03:46, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Should there be redirects where the old articles were, instead of just deleting them? Please? September Storm (talk) 04:55, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- There were only a handful of links to the subpages on the whole Wiki; I just redirected them all. ListenerXTalkerX 05:03, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Checking BorkedRedirects shows no loss. Keep 'em axed, sez I. 05:07, 29 May 2011 (UTC) C®ackeЯ
- What about links and bookmarks out there in the big wide world? I think SS has a good point, and how hard is it to do anyway? ħuman
05:20, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- If you think it is worth it, just restore the sixteen pages and change them to redirects into the consolidated page. There were links to each one in Template:Cp diff wp. ListenerXTalkerX 05:23, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- If you think it is worth it, just restore the sixteen pages and change them to redirects into the consolidated page. There were links to each one in Template:Cp diff wp.
- What about links and bookmarks out there in the big wide world? I think SS has a good point, and how hard is it to do anyway? ħuman
- Checking BorkedRedirects shows no loss. Keep 'em axed, sez I. 05:07, 29 May 2011 (UTC) C®ackeЯ
- There were only a handful of links to the subpages on the whole Wiki; I just redirected them all.
- Should there be redirects where the old articles were, instead of just deleting them? Please? September Storm (talk) 04:55, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Shit, if they're short enough, then yeah, cram them all onto one page. P-Foster (talk) 03:46, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- De-CP-ification should not really apply to the Conservapedia space, but the current pages are short enough that we probably do not even need to trim anything.
The Spurious .org Argument[edit]
As I mentioned in my edit summary, anyone can own a .org domain. Absolutely anyone. Look at the very much for-profit Slashdot.org sometime. There is no way to fix the argument, as it is, at the very most, uninteresting trivia based on a coincidence. —207.196.183.211 (talk) 07:46, 13 September 2011 (UTC)