Conservapedia talk:Differences with Wikipedia

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Move individual differences to subpages[edit]

The organization of these pages should be improved by putting the information about the individual differences in subpages of this page. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 03:27, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Or trimmed into short subsections of the same page, in the spirit of a less CP-centric wiki? P-Foster (talk) 03:32, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
De-CP-ification should not really apply to the Conservapedia space, but the current pages are short enough that we probably do not even need to trim anything. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 03:41, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Shit, if they're short enough, then yeah, cram them all onto one page. P-Foster (talk) 03:46, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Should there be redirects where the old articles were, instead of just deleting them? Please? September Storm (talk) 04:55, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
There were only a handful of links to the subpages on the whole Wiki; I just redirected them all. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 05:03, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Checking BorkedRedirects shows no loss. Keep 'em axed, sez I. 05:07, 29 May 2011 (UTC) C®ackeЯ
What about links and bookmarks out there in the big wide world? I think SS has a good point, and how hard is it to do anyway? ħumanUser talk:Human 05:20, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
If you think it is worth it, just restore the sixteen pages and change them to redirects into the consolidated page. There were links to each one in Template:Cp diff wp. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 05:23, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

The Spurious .org Argument[edit]

As I mentioned in my edit summary, anyone can own a .org domain. Absolutely anyone. Look at the very much for-profit Slashdot.org sometime. There is no way to fix the argument, as it is, at the very most, uninteresting trivia based on a coincidence. —207.196.183.211 (talk) 07:46, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Typos[edit]

As slightly outside my normal areas - the 18/16 differences in the lead, 'links to a certain blogs' in the non-commercial section need correcting, and the size of WP has changed from January 2020.

Some of the overview articles on WP might be regarded as essays - and one use of talk pages (as on RW) is to note Original Research.

Looking at the recent changes on CP - remove the contributions by 'Conservative', 'Karajou' and 'RobSmith' and there would be little by anybody else, while WP would be close to 500/500 different editors. Anna Livia (talk) 20:11, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia and naughty pics[edit]

The Samuel Johnson quote might be apt. He was told 'I see you have no 'inappropriate words' to which the Great Cham replied 'I see you looked.' Anna Livia (talk) 18:53, 11 August 2025 (UTC)