Conservapedia talk:Special Discussion Group

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Legal Threat?[edit]

Did TK really receive legal threats or is this some joke everybody but me is playing? (From my limited experience with legal stuff, this sounds plausible) NightFlare 17:02, 1 December 2007 (EST)

Actual threats. He told Andy to suck it and file. Andy's case is a complete loser-αmεσ (historian) 17:06, 1 December 2007 (EST)

Thanks to TK for fixing some minor factual details in the story. humanUser talk:Human 18:47, 1 December 2007 (EST)

You're welcome, but who were members and who started the whole deal are hardly minor. Dates are wrong too. But I can only take on so much responsibility keeping the world accurate, eh?  :P I will check the actuals, cause I am too old to remember, and put them on your talk page, Human. --TK/MyTalk 18:55, 1 December 2007 (EST)
Heck, if you dig out more accurate data, just edit the article, eh? But if you want me to, what, filter it, so be my task.... and I guess by minor, I mean I thought it was minor. As in trivial. That was just my opinion. But accuracy is still nice. humanUser talk:Human 21:42, 1 December 2007 (EST)

Sad edit, but true, NightFlare...-αmεσ (historian) 17:42, 20 March 2008 (EDT)

Feed me! NightFlareSpeak, mortal 17:51, 20 March 2008 (EDT)

Was it a legal threat which stopped you putting the juicy stuff up or did the cabal forget how to cut and paste. (I won't beg for the juicy stuff, so I'm stuck with snark) 09:05, 21 March 2008 (EDT) <pwned> Oops forgot note2, but still publish it some where</pwned>83.71.25.203 09:09, 21 March 2008 (EDT)

I think we think that it'd make us too much like CP to air their dirty laundry. Even if TK made it public, it still feels unseemly to bare their private lives, in the same fashion that we've griped about them doing.-αmεσ (historian) 10:47, 21 March 2008 (EDT)

Group members[edit]

This is the Trevor Bekolay mentioned in the article. I was shocked to see my name mentioned here, as I've never actually contributed to Conservapedia. I made an account there when 4chan discovered Conservapedia and started making thousands of accounts to vandalize it (or, in my view, improving it). Anyway, they started banning all new accounts, so I emailed all of the admins with some BS about the timing of my account creation being a coincidence. They reinstated the account, but I'd lost interest in vandalizing it at that point. So, the fact that I somehow got added to some group of theirs baffles me. Where was the information about group members obtained? I'd be curious to see how in the hell I was added. Trevor Bekolay 19:37, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

I'm curious about that, too. NightFlare 20:07, 23 April 2009 (EDT)
He joined on July 5, 2007, as Djtla. But if he was offended by this, it's comprehensible; any sane person would be. My apologies. --JJ4eI christen thee Sir Annoyz Alot 02:41, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
I removed your name.--JJ4eI christen thee Sir Annoyz Alot 02:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

"Not Much Is Known"?[edit]

Why not? Grab the special sauce and read up. I think we should add some awesome quotes here. This was on CPMonitor back in April. – Nick Heer 03:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)