Conservapedia talk:Three Laws of Schlafly

Heh... uh... MrPhaethon is actually me. Good to know you thought that was funny, though :)

It was actually a relief at the time to be able to mock them as much as I wanted. I was all up and down that page like a fiend.--Tom Moore^{fiat justitia ruat coelum} 23:53, 19 June 2008 (EDT)

Should be in the CP namespace, not fun? ħuman 01:49, 20 June 2008 (EDT)

I'd say there are actually four laws. The first two apply in order, but the third is that Andy is never allowed to admit he is wrong, unless it violates one of the previous two rules. Dignity comes after that as the fourth. Thunderkatz^Ho! 16:13, 25 June 2008 (EDT) P.S. Though I realize that these are done this way to parallel Asimov's laws.

Actually, the first law should be that Andy can never admit he is wrong. All other rules are secondary. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:51, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

MrPhaethon is TomMoore? Is there anyone on the interwebs anymore who isn't a sock of someone here?! Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 05:09, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

No, we are all AmesG. Except me--I'm a sock of SockOfGulik, in an odd sort of infinite regression. --Gulik 20:44, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

RA, don't you know how it works, or at least used to work? Time was, there were only 3 people on the internet: TK, and two people who hated him. Everyone else was a sock. Not sure if that still applies, though. Thunderkatz^Ho! 21:25, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

And both the people who hated him were sockpuppets. ħuman 23:21, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

Why "mother or Reagan"?

All of a sudden the father never manages to sneak into the picture. Or is their father indeed Ronald Reagan (that's about the right age, isn't it?)? [[User:K61824|]][[User_talk:K61824|]] 19:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)