Debate:Is it irrational to have a non-trivial doubt about metaphysical naturalism?

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Debate.png This is a Debate page.
Feel free to add your own spin on the story. Please keep it civil!
Information icon.svg This debate was created by Gquenot.

To clarify the question, by “non-trivial”, I mean beyond a simple methodological doubt. Also, I mean just a doubt, nothing close to a claim that metaphysical naturalism is false.

To push the question a bit further: is it irrational to be agnostic on metaphysical naturalism?