Debate:Is the Sam Harris page more biased than others?

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Debate.png This is a Debate page.
Feel free to add your own spin on the story. Please keep it civil!
Information icon.svg This debate was created by Nerdfighter.


Proposition[edit]

I feel like the rationalwiki`s article on Sam Harris is somewhat more biased than others. In fact the whole article criticizes Harris(which is something that conservapedia would do). Harris is a vocal critic of religion. He has even gone to great lengths to link Science with morality. I dont think its fair that the whole article is just about criticism. It`s biased.— Unsigned, by: Nerdfighter / talk / contribs

While we never claim to be unbiased, most people here agree our Sam Harris page is really bad. Christopher (talk) 14:52, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
So fix it. BicyclewheelToxic mowse.gif 15:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
I was just repeating what I've seen people saying, the first I knew of his existence was reading the RW page on him so I'm probably not the best person to fix it. Christopher (talk) 18:58, 21 June 2017 (UTC)