2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

Debate:Should we give Drexler more credit?

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Debate.png This is a Debate page.
Feel free to add your own spin on the story. Please keep it civil!
Information icon.svg This debate was created by Newton1030.


Proposition[edit]

The current RationalWiki article on nanotechnology portrays Drexler's work as complete pseudoscience that defies physics. Closer inspection reveals that may not be true, and even logical fallacies in the arguments for that position. The purpose of this debate is to rationally assess who is right.— Unsigned, by: Newton1030 / talk / contribs