|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 21:06, 16 April 2023 diff hist +200 Talk:Nanotechnology →Physics
- 16:06, 14 April 2023 diff hist -1,103 User:Newton1030 Blanked the page current Tag: Blanking
- 16:02, 14 April 2023 diff hist -287 Talk:Nanotechnology This isn't constructive
- 15:30, 14 April 2023 diff hist +2 Talk:Nanotechnology
- 15:30, 14 April 2023 diff hist -75 Talk:Nanotechnology
- 02:13, 14 April 2023 diff hist +360 Talk:Nanotechnology
- 01:21, 2 March 2023 diff hist 0 Nanotechnology A research paper mentioned 3+ but not 4+ (TODO: cite). Also highly charged ions are less soluble, probably gets reduced before leaving the crystal lattice.
- 02:54, 24 February 2023 diff hist +263 Talk:Nanotechnology →Physics
- 02:46, 24 February 2023 diff hist +355 N Debate:Should we give Drexler more credit? Created page with "{{debate|Your name goes in here}} == Proposition == The current RationalWiki article on nanotechnology portrays Drexler's work as complete pseudoscience that defies phys..."
- 20:09, 23 February 2023 diff hist +63 Talk:Nanotechnology
- 20:06, 23 February 2023 diff hist +457 Talk:Nanotechnology →Physics
- 00:38, 22 February 2023 diff hist +30 m Talk:Nanotechnology →Homeopathy
- 00:34, 22 February 2023 diff hist -43 Talk:Nanotechnology →Homeopathy
- 00:33, 22 February 2023 diff hist +1,097 Talk:Nanotechnology →Homeopathy
- 00:06, 22 February 2023 diff hist +3 m Talk:Nanotechnology →Physics
- 03:36, 20 February 2023 diff hist +518 Talk:Nanotechnology →Physics
- 04:26, 17 February 2023 diff hist +607 User:Newton1030
- 20:38, 16 February 2023 diff hist 0 m Nanotechnology →Conservative estimation
- 20:33, 16 February 2023 diff hist +498 Nanotechnology →Conservative estimation: Cogito ergo sum
- 15:07, 16 February 2023 diff hist -21 Nanotechnology →Conservative estimation
- 15:03, 16 February 2023 diff hist -17 Nanotechnology →Conservative estimation
- 15:02, 16 February 2023 diff hist +476 Nanotechnology →Conservative estimation: My edits desperately need peer review from someone more skeptical of this, but please don't delete it outright.
- 14:48, 16 February 2023 diff hist -5 Nanotechnology Give an accurate first impression to readers - no it doesn't violate physics, but there's still issues
- 14:44, 16 February 2023 diff hist +12 Nanotechnology →Conservative estimation
- 14:41, 16 February 2023 diff hist +146 Nanotechnology Reorganized the new content
- 05:25, 16 February 2023 diff hist +230 User:Newton1030
- 05:15, 16 February 2023 diff hist +259 m Talk:Nuclear power current
- 05:07, 16 February 2023 diff hist +4 m Nanotechnology Wikipedia link
- 05:05, 16 February 2023 diff hist -33 Nanotechnology →History: This was peer-reviewed scientists and engineers at MIT. Doesn't seem like science fiction to me!
- 04:37, 16 February 2023 diff hist +23 Nanotechnology →In science woo: We've already moved on from nano-technology, now we have femto-technology! It's been under our noses!
- 02:57, 16 February 2023 diff hist +234 Nanotechnology →In science woo: Patent office isn't perfect
- 02:12, 16 February 2023 diff hist +7 Nanotechnology →In science woo
- 01:17, 16 February 2023 diff hist 0 Nanotechnology →In science woo
- 01:07, 16 February 2023 diff hist -1 Nanotechnology →In science woo
- 01:05, 16 February 2023 diff hist +9 Nanotechnology →In science woo
- 01:03, 16 February 2023 diff hist +767 Nanotechnology →In science woo: Major edit, sort of related to computational chemistry (needs peer review)
- 00:51, 16 February 2023 diff hist 0 Nanotechnology →In science woo
- 00:49, 16 February 2023 diff hist +2,090 Nanotechnology →In science woo: The real issues with Drexler's work
- 23:45, 15 February 2023 diff hist -10 Nanotechnology →In science woo
- 23:43, 15 February 2023 diff hist +3 Nanotechnology →In science woo
- 23:42, 15 February 2023 diff hist +673 Nanotechnology →In science woo: Scientific research confirmed machine-phase matter can do certain things
- 03:37, 15 February 2023 diff hist +647 Nanotechnology →Toxicity: Improved nanomedicine section
- 03:19, 15 February 2023 diff hist +16 Talk:Nanotechnology →Physics
- 03:18, 15 February 2023 diff hist +793 Talk:Nanotechnology →Physics: Requesting permission to earn a Brainstar in quality
- 03:08, 15 February 2023 diff hist +884 Nanotechnology →In science woo: Cerium dioxide
- 17:06, 12 February 2023 diff hist +266 N User:Newton1030 Created page with "Hello! I am a skeptic, software engineer, and former transhumanist, currently studying nanoscience. My favorite science topics are thermodynamics, chemistry, and futurism. I h..."
- 16:38, 12 February 2023 diff hist +200 Nanotechnology →In science woo: Clarify that we are not encouraging the misleading concept of self-replicating nanobots
- 16:30, 12 February 2023 diff hist +1,513 Nanotechnology →In science woo: More accurate description of the problems with nanotech, while still remaining skeptical
- 13:24, 12 February 2023 diff hist +34 m Nanotechnology →External links: Add notes section
- 13:23, 12 February 2023 diff hist +771 Nanotechnology →In fiction: Better ecophagy section