2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $9223.37Goal: $10000

Draft talk:Involuntary Celibacy

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Discuss where this information should go[edit]

I think a lot of this still needs to be removed. However there is some fair information here that needs a home. Similarly, the state of being unable to find a sexual partner warrants some minor discussion.

Questions to consider:

Do we consider involuntary celibacy to be a notable subject worthy of an article?
Do we consider involuntary celibacy to be a Neologism or a Coatrack unworthy of an article? (See Abstinence or sexual frustration)
Do we consider involuntary celibacy to be a fringe theory worthy of an article?


involuntary celibacy probably should not exist. Where to eventually put this stuff? Also, where should the redirect go to?

involuntary celibacy (currently links to manosphere glossary, idk how to change this)
manosphere glossary
abstinence
sexual frustration
incel
other?


Kauri0.o (talk) 22:49, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

bump. Kauri0.o (talk) 02:02, 15 March 2021 (UTC)