Essay:Ann Coulter

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Essay.svg This essay is an original work by Morgan Brikiin.
It does not necessarily reflect the views expressed in RationalWiki's Mission Statement, but we welcome discussion of a broad range of ideas.
Unless otherwise stated, this is original content, released under CC-BY-SA 3.0 or any later version. See RationalWiki:Copyrights.
Feel free to make comments on the talk page, which will probably be far more interesting, and might reflect a broader range of RationalWiki editors' thoughts.

I just read some things about Ann Coulter – she is quite frankly the biggest fucking bitch on earth. She's a damn fundamentalist who thinks women shouldn't vote, and she's a woman! That's like a Jewish Neo-Nazi or a gay Republican. Here's some quotes from this queen bee bitch from hell along with comments by me relating to why I hope she dies:

"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war."

Fuck you, Fascist whore. How'd you feel if a country invaded where you lived, and you were fucking shot after tossed back and forth by a platoon of horny soldiers? Yes, that's war too, if you're a woman. Convert them to Christianity? I'm sorry bitch, I forgot this was the Ottoman Empire.

"I think [women] should be armed but should not vote. No, they all have to give up their vote, not just, you know, the lady clapping and me. The problem with women voting -- and your Communists will back me up on this -- is that, you know, women have no capacity to understand how money is earned. They have a lot of ideas on how to spend it. And when they take these polls, it's always more money on education, more money on child care, more money on day care."

If you think women should be behind the curtain in society, why did you write a bunch of books and go around bitching your conservative bullshit?

"If you want a shorter rebuilding process, then we're going to have to wage less humane wars. The enemy — as well as innocent civilians — must be bombed into quivering terror. Otherwise, we displace aggression but don't destroy it. Americans are weaker for having seen that kind of carnage in World War II. Recall that the Worst Generation was raised by the Greatest Generation. That tells you how awful war is. The Greatest Generation was so exhausted by the war, it didn't have the spine to stand up to pot-smoking, draft-dodging hippies occupying administration buildings."

Tell ya what, why don't you go to an African villiage in somewhere like the Central African Republic, and just sit back and watch 10 year old boys being shot, seeing women being raped, seeing buildings being burnt down. Honestly, Ann, you're a brainless jackass.

"We need to execute people like John Walker Lindh in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed, too. Otherwise, they will turn out to be outright traitors,"

Hey, here's an idea. You kill a few liberals, we kill a few conservatives, and have ourselves a big fucking genocide. Maybe we'll compromise and start doing it to the blacks instead, since, of course, we're human. Or how 'bout we just send you to Saudi Arabia, where you get rocks thrown at you for showing your ankle?

"Saddam's barbaric rape rooms, chemical attacks and torture — those, liberals could live with. But now they want us to send troops to Darfur, a country from which no one anticipates terrorism anytime in the next millennium. If you're looking for a good definition of "no imminent threat," Darfur is it... These people can't even wrap up genocide. We've been hearing about this slaughter in Darfur forever — and they still haven't finished. The aggressors are moving like termites across that country. It's like genocide by committee. Who's running this holocaust in Darfur, FEMA?...Darfur is not the threat... though a hostage-taking, Holocaust-denying lunatic who doesn't own a necktie but is within two years of having a nuclear bomb comes to mind. You can already hear Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi saying, "If the Democrats were in charge, the use of military force wouldn't be necessary because we'd constructively engage them and appease their stated desire to kill us."

So you like the idea of thousands of innocent people getting shot? Honestly I've never heard a rational human say that they wonder why they can't just shoot everybody and bury them all in a mass grave and be done with it. If genocide isn't a good reason to send a peacekeeping force, then why is an oppressive regime a good excuse to invade a country? The Nazis killed millions, Saddam killed thousands, tens of thousands are dying in Darfur.

Ann Coulter must've been held under water when she was a kid, because honestly, all she has to say is hot air, and sure, I'm just spewing hot air, but atleast I'm spewing hot air that smells like cookies, and she's spewing hot air composed mostly of chlorine gas. The only thing I'll give her is she breaks the idea set by Phyllis Schlafly that conservative nut job women are ugly, not like I'd do anything with her.

This is just more evidence that fundamentalist Christians are mindless idiots.