Essay:Dawkins Legacy
|
This essay is an original work by Kingdamian1. It does not necessarily reflect the views expressed in RationalWiki's Mission Statement, but we welcome discussion of a broad range of ideas. Unless otherwise stated, this is original content, released under CC-BY-SA 3.0 or any later version. See RationalWiki:Copyrights. Feel free to make comments on the talk page, which will probably be far more interesting, and might reflect a broader range of RationalWiki editors' thoughts. |
It became clear to me that Richard Dawkins has wasted his scientific career. No I am not talking about his atheism... I believe that militant atheism has destroyed his legacy... but he has wasted his scientific career on a MEANINGLESS TOPIC... Proving evolution! As an aspiring cardiologist, biology is very close to me. Richard Dawkins is an ethologist and a biologist. I have never seen any papers or lectures by him (even in the early stages) which did not come back to the EXACT SAME, MEANINGLESS TOPIC... genius of Charles Darwin, beauty of natural selection. Don't dare deny it. You have felt the same exact way!!!!!!!!!! Evolution is a meaningless topic. How can a biologist dedicate his whole scientific career to a single thing? Are there any evolution specialties in biology where that's the only thing you have to know? He could have written on any useful topic... He chose the MOST MEANINGLESS one... agree or disagree? Why? ThanksKingdamian1 (talk) 04:51, 20 July 2017 (UTC)