User talk:Kingdamian1

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is automatically archived by Archiver
Archives for this talk page: <1>, <2>

Copyvio[edit]

Do not steal other peoples copywritten work. You just uploaded http://msgphoto.com/content/daniel-dennett-philosopher-1/ .— Unsigned, by: Hipocrite / talk / contribs

Human Rights declaration.[edit]

Your user page currently states: "Article 18 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights[1] grants me "freedom to change [my] religion or belief." So the opinions that I state here might change at any time for any reason. Do keep that in mind!"

I really don't think that anyone needs official declarations to justify their ability to say, "I was wrong." I certainly don't.--Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 16:49, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

@Bob M I can change my opinion on ANYTHING for ANY REASON... that is the point of citing UDHR --Kingdamian1 (talk) 18:34, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
So can anyone else on the wiki. My point is that you don't need to quote The Universal Declaration of Human Rights in order to do so. But hey - if you feel you need the legal or moral justification then that's cool.Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 20:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Unrelated to Bob's wise words, but please keep begging Andy and Karajou to unblock you. It's most entertaining and I have NO DOUBT that your persistence will eventually be REWARDED. Helena Bonham Carter (talk) 22:29, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

@Helena Bonham Carter Why do you say that? Who are you? How do you know about my CP situation? --Kingdamian1 (talk) 23:49, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
HBC is one of the users that hangs around WIGO CP, poking fun at CP's ever more pathetic egomania. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 00:04, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
@GrammarCommie Ok. But I do NOT believe that I am mentioned in WIGO CP. Not even once, I think! --Kingdamian1 (talk) 00:14, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
I never claimed you were, I merely answered your question. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 01:00, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
@GrammarCommie So then how does she know about my situation on Conservapedia? It is NOT mentioned on WIGO --Kingdamian1 (talk) 01:01, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Carter probably read your talkpage archives, like I have. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 15:46, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Either that or they read the set of posts near the top of this page. So there's that. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 15:48, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

I am your no.1 fan, Josh. Your plight has moved me DEEPLY. You MUST be restored to Conservapedia so you can continue to contribute QUALITY articles to the project. The SHEER INJUSTICE of your predicament has UPSET me so much that I can BARELY SLEEP AT NIGHT.

I have informed Andy and Karajou of the DEVASTATING effect this is having on me, and they seem sympathetic. You should DEFINITELY mention me and my SUFFERING in your next communications with them.

Yours IN CHRIST, Helena Bonham Carter (talk) 19:58, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

@Helena Bonham Carter Stop making fun! I honestly want back! --Kingdamian1 (talk) 22:38, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
I know! That's what's so entertaining!
If you insist on ruining everything, though, here's a clue to your best route back in. Viddy well. Helena Bonham Carter (talk) 23:22, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
@Helena Bonham Carter How is that supposed to help? Kingdamian1 (talk) 01:33, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Found Something[edit]

If you're interested in Ancient Greek history, here's an article I found on the fall of Sparta. RoninMacbeth (talk) 17:28, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Wow! Thanks. Kingdamian1 (talk) 23:02, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

What the bloody hell are you playing at?[edit]

Subarachnid hemorrhage. What the bloody hell has that got to do with our mission? Nothing. That's why I deleted it. And what was with all those red links in it that had even less to do with our mission? This isn't just some poor man's Wikipedia where you can write about anything you like. Spud (talk) 23:36, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

@Spud Why are you so angry? I happen to be interested in medicine... It was well-researched and about a significant disorder. RW has some of those Cancer, Hypochondria, Split brain... SHOULD I GO ON? --Kingdamian1 (talk) 01:53, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
I'm angry because, on top of everything else I have to deal with, I have to deal with someone who should know better cocking up this wiki. I should hope you are interested in medicine if you want to be a doctor. But not everything connected to medicine falls within the scope of this wiki. I could write a beautifully written, well-referenced article about steak and kidney pie. A notable meat dish. But I'm not going to because I know it has sod all to do with RationalWiki. Spud (talk) 05:56, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Rubbish. Every wiki needs a beautifully written, well-referenced article about steak and kidney pie. If you write it, they will read. Helena Bonham Carter (talk) 00:15, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
LOL --Kingdamian1 (talk) 02:38, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Wot[edit]

Just curious, what is the purpose of hiding your username from your edits to Conservapedia:What is going on at CP? Regards, Cosmikdebris (talk) 03:34, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

I am blocked on Conservapedia. And it is not because I am a troll. I thought that Conservapedians may have interpreted my WIGO edits as disrespectful, if they saw it and that is why I hid them. It doesn't look like I am getting unblocked any time soon, so it doesn't matter much now. As a side note, I honestly was NOT trying to be disrespectful to CP or it's editors. Unfortunately, they have a poor track record of being able to differentiate between enemies and friends, so to speak! Kingdamian1 (talk) 06:21, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Why don't you try joining with a new account? Start with a clean slate? RoninMacbeth (talk) 06:34, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Because they can run a checkuser, which will identify me soon. Or identify a proxy server. Kingdamian1 (talk) 06:37, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
They can, yes. But they will probably only do so if they get suspicious. Besides, if they did, wouldn't it simply demonstrate that CP is unwelcoming, even to other conservatives? If they allow you to stay, you will have gained entry into a community of fellow conservatives. If they ban you, that will only demonstrate that perhaps CP isn't the place for you. Sounds like a win-win to me. RoninMacbeth (talk) 06:59, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
I do not think that CP version of conservatism is mainstream. There are many ways I disagree with them. It's like here. I disagree with RW but I still edit. I have created multiple sock accounts before, so any time a new account is open they get suspicious, I guess. Kingdamian1 (talk) 14:22, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
They have a VERY constricted view of what a conservative is. I was called a left winger sometimes, I am NOT even joking. I live in Canada and I am an American exceptionalist, for crying out loud, and they thought I was a left winger. Aside, from politics, pointing out problems is not appreciated, but interpreted as "picking a fight", "demanding your own way" etc. etc. You be the judge... Usually, on Conservapedia, ONLY people who edit substantially are more or less, users who have been there for some time. They usually have some editing rights. But the problem is that these editors do NOT contribute equally. They have pet articles or themes they care about, and mainly edit those articles/themes. This leaves a gap between the depth of articles. This is an article on a world-renowned magician, Derren Brown[1], a short stub with NO references. And this is the article on Atheism and Bestiality[2]. This is the article on biography.[3] And this is an article on "Token conservative".[4] This is an article on violent crime,[5] and this is an article on Atheism and cowardice.[6] You see what I mean? Some articles, which seem rather unimportant are edited WAY more and are more in depth, simply because an editor cares more, while important topics are left as stubs. Unlike other wikis, pointing out these things results in suspicion. On other wikis, pointing these out would earn a "thank you, can you help with that?"... On CP, this is considered "picking a fight." --Kingdamian1 (talk) 15:43, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Karajou[edit]

Hello, I moved your questions about Karajou's article to Conservapedia talk:Karajou. I think it belongs there. I'm sure the most active editors monitor the Recent changes page and would notice your contribution there.

I scanned through Karajou's despicable blog and didn't find much justifying the "borderline white supremacist" statement yet; however vile posts like "Getting Away With It in Liberal Land" show that Karajou employs a lot of the standard race-baiting approaches in his screeds, and it is quite obvious where his sympathies lie. He always couches his subtle racism by blaming it on "the liberals." Cosmikdebris (talk) 00:32, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

@Cosmikdebris I don't see much evidence ANYWHERE that Karajou has had ANY significant racist leanings. Neither does it seem anyone from the early days thought that. That addition seems relatively recent, with no evidence. --Kingdamian1 (talk) 02:11, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Since the troubling statement is rather shaky and controversial, I don't have any problem with removing it from the article, or appending {{Fact}} to it. Cosmikdebris (talk) 12:38, 19 July 2018 (UTC)