Essay:Subterfuge manipulation

For your information: Some drive-by editor spammed us with this, and though we decided not to delete it, we don't really care much for it. The talk page is probably a lot more interesting than the actual essay.

"...Who runs this place? Ultimately, nobody. It's a wiki..." [ https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki#Administration ]

Before you go jumping-a-spark, this is a legitimate entry which aims to improve the RationalWiki, and incites you to engage your participation just as any entry in the myriad selections on RationalWiki ... or more precisely "irRATionalWiki (explained)".

- There is a very high chance on RationalWiki this message will be censored, quickly erased from the front focus, archived, fossilized, obfuscated, buried so deep only a few if any eyes will ever get to partake in its savor.

Objectivity here in certain content stands not a chance(or will it!?). 'Certain' directly implies that much of RationalWiki is indeed refreshing true information that is stomped on by major groups on Earth so that it has become 'déchet', reject not significant to humans, when they are in fact very significant, critically important and more than often the remedy to many of society's ailments. That said, read on...

Is there anything wrong with criticizing the venue one is 'privileged' to frequent? Here we go again, dealing with 'chosenitery', privilege, supremacy. In other words, shall we all submit to the expression: if you don't like it lump it! expression which is usually uttered by the party in discussion who fails to latch on to a valid counter-point, yet want to prevail in holding its own version of the truth, its opinion, its inDOCtrination, its bigotry!

Shall anyone partake in wholesome criticism of the venue which itself offers the platform for discussion!? ...when the venue(itself) holds the reins of censorship!

It is like of a neighbour's relationship, business place etiquette, close personal quarters...: Don't bite the hand that feeds you.

[ or much more coarsely ] 'Don't s h i t where you eat', a temporary axiom in truth which generally results in a permanent complete failure to oppose the oppression at hand along with failure to hold accountable its perpetrators both which the confrontation will surely ignite and cause to be swiftly abated. - The About page of RationalWiki is a but a subterfuge manipulation in terms. It leads one to think one is in a censor free realm, while it misleads hiding true colors in maximum censorship.

- RationalWiki yet another web source which claims its place in the realm of truth, yet perpetrates the worst crime in humanity, the LIE, the steering of the narrative towards a consensus self-acquaint of the steered kind.

One only needs to collect samples in the massive amount of such violations on this site to expose the practices. Hiding behind any articles of rules such as the CC-BY-SA 3.0 bears zero effect as has been shown in many precedent cases where free speech prevailed with the full weight of penalties that come with its(free speech) violation.

Feel free to pick some choice samples to enhance the understanding of this entry which stands as the depiction of a real process in life that is often exposed as such, yet dimly highlighted. Nonetheless if it exists, however irrational it needs to be presented rationally to humanity as one of its pieces.

Thus while keeping in mind rats calling you a dog does not change they are rats: - will you enhance this entry in a way that will improve RationalWiki and let it shine in high % as a source to go to? - will you find a way to spin it in its own favor in spite of its criminal intent with respect to its censorship? - will you kindly have the fortitude to expose this ratWiki has rats at the helm? - ...more likely and important, will you even see this critical post bathing in its free speech aura? ...moot point if this post gets rolled <O:)