Essay talk:Neon Genesis Evangelion

Evaluation of the innately subjective

The ultimate question of whether intentional irony in pursuit of making a point, that is thus stated without qualification, in spite of the reality of needing qualifications succeeds at a greater point than the naive one it plays at. Does it, to state as a simple, factual truth, that which could not be further in nature from fact, neither antithetical, nor of-the-form can, in itself lend credence to the claim? Does the irony, and the awareness of the very ludicrousness itself, bare a kind of testimonial of truth? As if to say, "I know I lie, so I must understand the truth." It's impossible to be certain, in much the same way it's impossible to be certain of the objective value of subjective, artistic creations.

Besides, Dragon Ball was better. ikanreed ^{🐐Bleat at me} 22:47, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

That is (Not) True. Commie Lib (talk) 23:26, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Also Shiji Ikari and Kaworu increase the quality of EVA by 1000%. Commie Lib (talk) 23:27, 7 March 2019 (UTC)